Things I Wish I Knew Before: Skip the Universal Life Insurance

I'm not a big fan of universal life insurance. But I have it anyway.

Just after my husband and I married, we decided that it was a good idea to purchase life insurance for each of us. We were just starting out, and it seemed like a good idea. We didn't know much about life insurance — or anything financial. What we knew was that we needed to be careful with our money, and that we had credit card debt.

We had a friend who had?just?received his license to sell insurance. He was ready to help us out. He recommended a universal life insurance policy, gushing about how it builds cash value and how he was using his own universal life policy as a savings vehicle. At the time, interest rates weren't super-fantastic, but they beat where they're at now, and, besides, over the course of the next few years, in the run up to 2007, interest rates rose.

Because we didn't know any better, we went for it. It would cover us our whole lives, and it would be a great savings vehicle! Yay!

Universal Life Insurance Company Marker

The Reality of Universal Life Insurance Hits Home

For more than 10 years, I was ok with the universal life policy. As I learned more about finances, mainly due to the fact that I write about them, I began to see that a universal life policy isn't the way to build wealth over time. But the premiums weren't bad because we didn't have a lot of coverage. I figured the cash value built up would be enough, at some point, to take a nice vacation or something in early retirement (this was also before I revised my views of retirement and life design).

At any rate, when I started making more money, the insurance agent tried to get me to boost my universal life coverage, but I refused and decided to just get a term life policy. We still had our universal life coverage, but since it wasn't costing us that much, we just figured it would make a nice back-up.

And then, this year happened.

We had been going along with the universal life coverage, paying the minimum. The minimum established way back when we bought the policy. It was building cash value, thanks to rising interest rates. However, that's not how universal life keeps working. Sometimes, the premium has to be adjusted to reflect the changing interest rates. The cash value in your policy can make up for the difference, but if you end up with a few years in a row of rates that are stuck between 0 and 0.25 percent, things are going to get ugly.

This year, it turns out that my husband and I were each $300 short of keeping our universal life policies in place. When I received the notices, I was a bit confused. Weren't we paying the minimum? I hadn't really thought about it, even after I started writing about finances. We were paying the minimum, and that seemed just fine.

Money

So I called the insurance agent. I talked to a secretary or intern or something. She looked at my information. She had no clue why our policies were on the verge of collapse. I called the home office. The two people I talked to?at the home office didn't get it, either. They promised to look into the situation and get back to me. They didn't. My policy lapsed and then my insurance agent called. He explained everything to me, including the fact that, since ours was one of the first policies he sold, he didn't really get it at the time, either. But now he could explain it all to me. Our minimum just wasn't enough anymore. That simple.

My husband and I were faced with a choice: Should we just let the policies die? Or should we fight for reinstatement? For better or for worse, we decided on reinstatement. I paid the amount we were short, and we are boosting our premium payment (the excess of which will go toward our slowly building cash value).

The extra premium payment isn't onerous, and I'm not overly fond of the idea of continuing with the universal life policy, but my husband and I decided that losing the cash value built up so far (and we are?so close to some special and fabulous milestone that I am assured will make all this worth it) was even worse. It's not the most effective savings vehicle out there, but it's not stopping us from our retirement account contributions, or the regular contributions to the investment account that serves as my emergency fund.

So we'll keep with it.

There are lots of things I'd tell my younger self. And one of those things would be to just get the term life insurance and invest the premium difference. But, hey, it's about living and learning, right?

7 thoughts on “Things I Wish I Knew Before: Skip the Universal Life Insurance”

  1. I have Universal Life insurance and I’m ok with that. My situation is different in that it is not on me and my wife it is on my children. I have a neurological disorder that severly limits my ability to be insures without paying astronomical premiums and it is potentially something they will inherit so I chose to ensure my kids with a couple of riders that allow them to increase their coverage once they are older.

    The product is not bad, it is what it is used for. You may have been much better off with term insurance and you still may be better off cancelling the universal life and getting term if that fits your plan better.

    1. Miranda Marquit

      Thanks for your reply, Cory! I agree that it largely depends on your strategy, and what you’re trying to accomplish. And part of it lies in actually knowing what’s going on. If I had to do it again, I probably wouldn’t have chosen UL. But since we’ve had it for so long, I’m ok with it, especially since it’s more gravy to get us through just about anything. The extra premium was just a surprise. We’ve reconciled to it. And we can still get a good vacation out of the cash value in about 15 years!

  2. John S @ Frugal Rules

    I worked in life insurance for five years and hate to see it when UL is marketed for something it’s not meant for. For most, a good term plan is all that is needed, especially when you’re younger. For those that it does work for then it’s a good product, but otherwise, it’s a waste of money.

    1. I agree with John. Term is sufficient for most people, and gets you more coverage for the money. Your story of an agent not really understanding what he is selling is not too uncommon as the industry has about a 10% success rate for new agents. I also like term because its simple to understand and not complicated – make sure you understand what you are buying is the lesson.

  3. life settlement blog

    The thing that people have to remember is that insurance salesmen are like any other salesmen. But there’s things that you can do to make sure you get the coverage that you really need at the right price. The first and best thing is simply to find a reputable agent or broker. But another thing you can do that’s usually overlooked is to find and read a solid insurance or life settlement blog and ask questions.

  4. David - Beaconlifefunds.com

    Of course a life insurance policy could not built wealth. It built your asset through insurance policy and only a few amount of it you can cash in thanks to universal type of insurance policy. An asset in this case as a life insurance policy is not your wealth. It is but it will be not. Confused? Haha. You can’t easily cash in a life insurance policy however lately there are third parties who are willing to do just that. Anyway, in your case, it does not seem what you thought it will be in the future right? Either most life insurance agents do not exactly understand what they are offering or they are just explaining one side of the coin. That is their job. That is their main source of income. Be careful everybody!

  5. I agree with you David. It’s not easy to cash in life insurance policy. I have faced it and the experience was horrible.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Scroll to Top